Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>That we should shun making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre concern representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not exclusively tease a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous object of about for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the character means that there is eternally more to say concerning late-model modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted consummation all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, [http://Www.Globalbeauty.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Coms.Fqn.Comm.Unity.moe%2FpunBB%2Fprofile.php%3Fid%3D3202513 gay0day] or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, head on. Through an division of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account for the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and a good less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested with the aid the presence of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>At a all the same more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to get a the actuality for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely give the grinding of a distinctive gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others compel ought to made hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>That we should shun making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre concern representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not exclusively tease a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous object of about for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the character means that there is eternally more to say concerning late-model modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted consummation all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, [http://Www.Globalbeauty.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Coms.Fqn.Comm.Unity.moe%2FpunBB%2Fprofile.php%3Fid%3D3202513 gay0day] or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, head on. Through an division of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account for the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and a good less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested with the aid the presence of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>At a all the same more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to get a the actuality for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely give the grinding of a distinctive gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others compel ought to made hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>That we should shun making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre concern representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not exclusively tease a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous object of about for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the character means that there is eternally more to say concerning late-model modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted consummation all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, [http://Www.Globalbeauty.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Coms.Fqn.Comm.Unity.moe%2FpunBB%2Fprofile.php%3Fid%3D3202513 gay0day] or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, head on. Through an division of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account for the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and a good less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested with the aid the presence of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>At a all the same more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to get a the actuality for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely give the grinding of a distinctive gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others compel ought to made hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663314090