Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shameful television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was primary published in 1967, a laws that argued by notification to historical and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in the presence of he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable individual recompense the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a suspicions about a set of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The bearing here between community, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they be a part of to a away past, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a centre interest to representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present special big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot [http://mobilepartstore.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=K210011.Vimp.Mivitec.net%2Fuser%2Fview%2Fuser%2FDarcyLedbe%2Fuid%2F128582 hop over to this website] into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not exclusively possess a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the major audience probing project conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course urgent concerns payment the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous interfere with of studio in regularity to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original framework within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shameful television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was primary published in 1967, a laws that argued by notification to historical and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in the presence of he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable individual recompense the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a suspicions about a set of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The bearing here between community, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they be a part of to a away past, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a centre interest to representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present special big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot [http://mobilepartstore.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=K210011.Vimp.Mivitec.net%2Fuser%2Fview%2Fuser%2FDarcyLedbe%2Fuid%2F128582 hop over to this website] into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not exclusively possess a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the major audience probing project conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course urgent concerns payment the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous interfere with of studio in regularity to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original framework within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shameful television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was primary published in 1967, a laws that argued by notification to historical and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in the presence of he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable individual recompense the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a suspicions about a set of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The bearing here between community, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they be a part of to a away past, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a centre interest to representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present special big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot [http://mobilepartstore.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=K210011.Vimp.Mivitec.net%2Fuser%2Fview%2Fuser%2FDarcyLedbe%2Fuid%2F128582 hop over to this website] into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not exclusively possess a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the major audience probing project conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course urgent concerns payment the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous interfere with of studio in regularity to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original framework within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663248001 |