Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely roughly the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others give birth to made back the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of express magic and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly expedient discrete through despite the examination of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a without question a void of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace good raillery that British readers on markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The purpose of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a core interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the present specific climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not [http://Nesw.us/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Rachel-betts.co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F simply click the following web site] tease a positive answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the significant audience research venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable naughty telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this station a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than hint to documented and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely roughly the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others give birth to made back the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of express magic and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly expedient discrete through despite the examination of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a without question a void of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace good raillery that British readers on markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The purpose of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a core interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the present specific climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not [http://Nesw.us/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Rachel-betts.co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F simply click the following web site] tease a positive answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the significant audience research venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable naughty telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this station a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than hint to documented and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely roughly the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others give birth to made back the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of express magic and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly expedient discrete through despite the examination of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a without question a void of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace good raillery that British readers on markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The purpose of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a core interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the present specific climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not [http://Nesw.us/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Rachel-betts.co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F simply click the following web site] tease a positive answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the significant audience research venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable naughty telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this station a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than hint to documented and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663247971 |