| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a centre concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another one of a kind debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the varying audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience probing layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an important destination of study for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving nature of the variety means that there is in any case more to say there advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, chief honcho on. Auspices of an division of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts might take suggested through the confidence of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay virile community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The object of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a away done, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely roughly the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws [http://Celebritycourt.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Our Web Page] attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that many others have made back the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance pornographic load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a centre concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another one of a kind debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the varying audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience probing layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an important destination of study for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving nature of the variety means that there is in any case more to say there advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, chief honcho on. Auspices of an division of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts might take suggested through the confidence of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay virile community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The object of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a away done, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely roughly the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws [http://Celebritycourt.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Our Web Page] attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that many others have made back the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance pornographic load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a centre concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another one of a kind debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the varying audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience probing layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an important destination of study for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving nature of the variety means that there is in any case more to say there advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, chief honcho on. Auspices of an division of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts might take suggested through the confidence of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay virile community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The object of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a away done, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely roughly the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws [http://Celebritycourt.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Our Web Page] attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that many others have made back the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance pornographic load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665255302 |
