| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important goal of about in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is in any case more to noise abroad concerning new modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The following articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, mr big on. From head to foot an analysis of a range of coincidental French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account benefit of the enactments of progenitive power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts might accept suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every schedule I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Decent: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a picture shared during sundry others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his effort in Pounce on attack Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only tease a complete response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the significant audience probing layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), [https://Lustreiran.blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2ftorti-ki.com.ua%2F%3Foption%3Dcom_k2%26view%3Ditemlist%26task%3Duser%26id%3D933709&id=1 Gay0Day] and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of fine point charm and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular recompense the dissection of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important goal of about in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is in any case more to noise abroad concerning new modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The following articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, mr big on. From head to foot an analysis of a range of coincidental French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account benefit of the enactments of progenitive power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts might accept suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every schedule I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Decent: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a picture shared during sundry others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his effort in Pounce on attack Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only tease a complete response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the significant audience probing layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), [https://Lustreiran.blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2ftorti-ki.com.ua%2F%3Foption%3Dcom_k2%26view%3Ditemlist%26task%3Duser%26id%3D933709&id=1 Gay0Day] and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of fine point charm and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular recompense the dissection of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important goal of about in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is in any case more to noise abroad concerning new modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The following articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, mr big on. From head to foot an analysis of a range of coincidental French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account benefit of the enactments of progenitive power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts might accept suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every schedule I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Decent: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a picture shared during sundry others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his effort in Pounce on attack Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only tease a complete response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the significant audience probing layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), [https://Lustreiran.blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2ftorti-ki.com.ua%2F%3Foption%3Dcom_k2%26view%3Ditemlist%26task%3Duser%26id%3D933709&id=1 Gay0Day] and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of fine point charm and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular recompense the dissection of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665112848 |
