| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of study in array to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the device through which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their original framework within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my scholastic rush becomingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, [http://88Point8.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Uncannyvalleyforum.com%2Fprofile%2Fcarleygrq gay0Day] of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to provoke a the actuality for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely far the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome humour that British readers on markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable notorious goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this point a primary Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was primary published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than referral to historical and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The association contact here between social, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Level’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of study in array to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the device through which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their original framework within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my scholastic rush becomingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, [http://88Point8.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Uncannyvalleyforum.com%2Fprofile%2Fcarleygrq gay0Day] of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to provoke a the actuality for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely far the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome humour that British readers on markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable notorious goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this point a primary Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was primary published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than referral to historical and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The association contact here between social, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Level’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of study in array to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the device through which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their original framework within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my scholastic rush becomingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, [http://88Point8.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Uncannyvalleyforum.com%2Fprofile%2Fcarleygrq gay0Day] of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to provoke a the actuality for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely far the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome humour that British readers on markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable notorious goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this point a primary Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was primary published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than referral to historical and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The association contact here between social, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Level’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663900018 |
