Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 0 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Samsung QN90B Review: This QLED TV From The Future s So Bright |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Samsung QN90B Review: This QLED TV From The Future s So Bright |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | id="article-body" class="row " section="article-body" data-component="trackCWV"><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>The I've reviewed use OLED screens, but OLED isn't the be-all, end-all in picture quality. High-end TVs with can get brighter than any OLED television and come pretty close in other important areas like . Samsung's QN90B is a great example, delivering searing brightness with few other compromises thanks to , and technology. It's a futuristic-sounding mouthful, [http://bodyteam12.com Kinogo] but it works.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>8.3<br><br><br>Samsung QN90B series (2022)<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>LikeBest non-OLED picture quality we've ever testedIncredible brightness with minimal bloomingStylish design, packed with features<br><br>Don't LikeExpensiveSlightly worse contrast, off-angle and uniformity than OLED<br><br><br><br><br>I the Samsung side-by-side with an LG OLED TV and while the LG won, the Samsung came as close as any [https://www.bing.com/search?q=non-OLED%20TV&form=MSNNWS&mkt=en-us&pq=non-OLED%20TV non-OLED TV] I've tested. The QN90B's ability to focus that light output with very little blooming o compatibility, the QN90B is simply stacked. If you're in the high-end TV market and looking for an alternative to OLED, or you just have a bright room, the QN90B deserves a look.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-
+id="article-body" class="row " section="article-body" data-component="trackCWV"><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>The I've reviewed use OLED screens, but OLED isn't the be-all, end-all in picture quality. High-end TVs with can get brighter than any OLED television and come pretty close in other important areas like . Samsung's QN90B is a great example, delivering searing brightness with few other compromises thanks to , and technology. It's a futuristic-sounding mouthful, [http://bodyteam12.com Kinogo] but it works.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>8.3<br><br><br>Samsung QN90B series (2022)<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>LikeBest non-OLED picture quality we've ever testedIncredible brightness with minimal bloomingStylish design, packed with features<br><br>Don't LikeExpensiveSlightly worse contrast, off-angle and uniformity than OLED<br><br><br><br><br>I the Samsung side-by-side with an LG OLED TV and while the LG won, the Samsung came as close as any [https://www.bing.com/search?q=non-OLED%20TV&form=MSNNWS&mkt=en-us&pq=non-OLED%20TV non-OLED TV] I've tested. The QN90B's ability to focus that light output with very little blooming o compatibility, the QN90B is simply stacked. If you're in the high-end TV market and looking for an alternative to OLED, or you just have a bright room, the QN90B deserves a look.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | id="article-body" class="row " section="article-body" data-component="trackCWV"><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>The I've reviewed use OLED screens, but OLED isn't the be-all, end-all in picture quality. High-end TVs with can get brighter than any OLED television and come pretty close in other important areas like . Samsung's QN90B is a great example, delivering searing brightness with few other compromises thanks to , and technology. It's a futuristic-sounding mouthful, [http://bodyteam12.com Kinogo] but it works.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>8.3<br><br><br>Samsung QN90B series (2022)<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>LikeBest non-OLED picture quality we've ever testedIncredible brightness with minimal bloomingStylish design, packed with features<br><br>Don't LikeExpensiveSlightly worse contrast, off-angle and uniformity than OLED<br><br><br><br><br>I the Samsung side-by-side with an LG OLED TV and while the LG won, the Samsung came as close as any [https://www.bing.com/search?q=non-OLED%20TV&form=MSNNWS&mkt=en-us&pq=non-OLED%20TV non-OLED TV] I've tested. The QN90B's ability to focus that light output with very little blooming o compatibility, the QN90B is simply stacked. If you're in the high-end TV market and looking for an alternative to OLED, or you just have a bright room, the QN90B deserves a look.<br>
|