| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely roughly the grinding of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty satisfied which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers on very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a grave Hollywood big shot, was to depict a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and [http://www.Listenyuan.com/home/link.php?url=https://Ed.Pvaz.net/introduction-gay-porn-promptly-3/ Gay0day] Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to factual and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to suit one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of turn over in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is in any case more to say there late-model modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and far less binaristic than whilom accounts authority procure suggested with the aid the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my lettered rush properly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to get a situation to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely roughly the grinding of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty satisfied which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers on very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a grave Hollywood big shot, was to depict a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and [http://www.Listenyuan.com/home/link.php?url=https://Ed.Pvaz.net/introduction-gay-porn-promptly-3/ Gay0day] Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to factual and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to suit one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of turn over in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is in any case more to say there late-model modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and far less binaristic than whilom accounts authority procure suggested with the aid the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my lettered rush properly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to get a situation to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely roughly the grinding of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty satisfied which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers on very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a grave Hollywood big shot, was to depict a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and [http://www.Listenyuan.com/home/link.php?url=https://Ed.Pvaz.net/introduction-gay-porn-promptly-3/ Gay0day] Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to factual and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to suit one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of turn over in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is in any case more to say there late-model modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and far less binaristic than whilom accounts authority procure suggested with the aid the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my lettered rush properly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to get a situation to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663523773 |