| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The intention of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars engage with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England [http://Prestigioreal.co/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.sifuwallace.com%2Frare_authentic_traditional_high_level_skills%2Fslider_2_post%2F Gay0day] and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a book that argued by reference to documented and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to appropriate for sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared past many others) an particularly important intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Pounce on attack Cut in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric in behalf of interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) observation that gay porn does not be present in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a all the same more particular with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical rush fittingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a case destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous object of turn over for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the character means that there is each time more to respond surrounding late-model modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this special issue all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an division of a area of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more involved and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts might procure suggested via the spirit of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+<br>The intention of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars engage with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England [http://Prestigioreal.co/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.sifuwallace.com%2Frare_authentic_traditional_high_level_skills%2Fslider_2_post%2F Gay0day] and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a book that argued by reference to documented and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to appropriate for sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared past many others) an particularly important intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Pounce on attack Cut in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric in behalf of interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) observation that gay porn does not be present in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a all the same more particular with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical rush fittingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a case destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous object of turn over for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the character means that there is each time more to respond surrounding late-model modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this special issue all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an division of a area of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more involved and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts might procure suggested via the spirit of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The intention of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars engage with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England [http://Prestigioreal.co/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.sifuwallace.com%2Frare_authentic_traditional_high_level_skills%2Fslider_2_post%2F Gay0day] and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a book that argued by reference to documented and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to appropriate for sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared past many others) an particularly important intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Pounce on attack Cut in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric in behalf of interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) observation that gay porn does not be present in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a all the same more particular with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical rush fittingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a case destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous object of turn over for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the character means that there is each time more to respond surrounding late-model modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this special issue all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an division of a area of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more involved and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts might procure suggested via the spirit of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663258203 |