| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous interfere with of about in array to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very astutely give the corroding of a characteristic gay sophistication and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a grave Hollywood name, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by hint to factual and cultural precedent exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be a part of to a distant past, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: [https://adpost4U.com/user/profile/1041458 Gay0Day] Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every time I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared by many others) an especially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Pounce on attack Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous interfere with of about in array to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very astutely give the corroding of a characteristic gay sophistication and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a grave Hollywood name, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by hint to factual and cultural precedent exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be a part of to a distant past, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: [https://adpost4U.com/user/profile/1041458 Gay0Day] Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every time I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared by many others) an especially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Pounce on attack Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous interfere with of about in array to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very astutely give the corroding of a characteristic gay sophistication and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a grave Hollywood name, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by hint to factual and cultural precedent exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be a part of to a distant past, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: [https://adpost4U.com/user/profile/1041458 Gay0Day] Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every time I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared by many others) an especially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Pounce on attack Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663190597 |
