Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 383 797 du journal

2 juillet 2022 à 22:04 : AlfonzoKuefer23 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Online Safety Bill: UK Lawmakers Recommend Tighter Rules For Big Tech. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

 
+
id="article-body" class="row" section="article-body" data-component="trackCWV"><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>UK lawmakers want to further tighten new rules governing Big Tech ahead of a parliamentary vote. A joint committee of members of Parliament from the House of Commons and peers from the House of Lords published recommendations on Tuesday to tighten the draft Online Safety Bill before Parliament votes on the legislation next year.<br>The , previou and  to . At the conclusion of their investigation, they have published a report advising that the new law should apply more widely than currently stated in the draft bill.<br><br>"The Committee has set out recommendations to bring more offences clearly within the scope of the Online Safety Bill, give Ofcom the power in law to set minimum safety standards for the services they will regulate, and to take enforcement action against companies if they don't comply," said Committee Chair Damian Collins in a statement.<br><br>The recommendations suggest new criminal offenses be added to the bill, including "cyberflashing" (sending unwanted nude pictures) and content encouraging people to self-harm. They also suggest making it illegal to deliberately send flashing images to people with photosensitive epilepsy and giving porn sites a legal obligation to keep children off them. Additionally, the lawmakers recommended that paid-for advertising used to conduct scams or fraud should be included in the scope of the bill.<br><br>Other recommendations include Ofcom drawing up codes of practice on topics including child exploitation and  [http://nude-milf.top/ http://nude-milf.top/] terrorism with which tech platforms must comply, as well as adding new codes when new problems arise so that the legislation remains relevant as tech changes.<br><br>"The era of self-regulation for big tech has come to an end," said Collins. "The companies are clearly responsible for services they have designed and profit from, and need to be held to account for the decisions they make."<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
AlfonzoKuefer23
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
0
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Online Safety Bill: UK Lawmakers Recommend Tighter Rules For Big Tech
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Online Safety Bill: UK Lawmakers Recommend Tighter Rules For Big Tech
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
id="article-body" class="row" section="article-body" data-component="trackCWV"><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>UK lawmakers want to further tighten new rules governing Big Tech ahead of a parliamentary vote. A joint committee of members of Parliament from the House of Commons and peers from the House of Lords published recommendations on Tuesday to tighten the draft Online Safety Bill before Parliament votes on the legislation next year.<br>The , previou and to . At the conclusion of their investigation, they have published a report advising that the new law should apply more widely than currently stated in the draft bill.<br><br>"The Committee has set out recommendations to bring more offences clearly within the scope of the Online Safety Bill, give Ofcom the power in law to set minimum safety standards for the services they will regulate, and to take enforcement action against companies if they don't comply," said Committee Chair Damian Collins in a statement.<br><br>The recommendations suggest new criminal offenses be added to the bill, including "cyberflashing" (sending unwanted nude pictures) and content encouraging people to self-harm. They also suggest making it illegal to deliberately send flashing images to people with photosensitive epilepsy and giving porn sites a legal obligation to keep children off them. Additionally, the lawmakers recommended that paid-for advertising used to conduct scams or fraud should be included in the scope of the bill.<br><br>Other recommendations include Ofcom drawing up codes of practice on topics including child exploitation and [http://nude-milf.top/ http://nude-milf.top/] terrorism with which tech platforms must comply, as well as adding new codes when new problems arise so that the legislation remains relevant as tech changes.<br><br>"The era of self-regulation for big tech has come to an end," said Collins. "The companies are clearly responsible for services they have designed and profit from, and need to be held to account for the decisions they make."<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ - +id="article-body" class="row" section="article-body" data-component="trackCWV"><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>UK lawmakers want to further tighten new rules governing Big Tech ahead of a parliamentary vote. A joint committee of members of Parliament from the House of Commons and peers from the House of Lords published recommendations on Tuesday to tighten the draft Online Safety Bill before Parliament votes on the legislation next year.<br>The , previou and to . At the conclusion of their investigation, they have published a report advising that the new law should apply more widely than currently stated in the draft bill.<br><br>"The Committee has set out recommendations to bring more offences clearly within the scope of the Online Safety Bill, give Ofcom the power in law to set minimum safety standards for the services they will regulate, and to take enforcement action against companies if they don't comply," said Committee Chair Damian Collins in a statement.<br><br>The recommendations suggest new criminal offenses be added to the bill, including "cyberflashing" (sending unwanted nude pictures) and content encouraging people to self-harm. They also suggest making it illegal to deliberately send flashing images to people with photosensitive epilepsy and giving porn sites a legal obligation to keep children off them. Additionally, the lawmakers recommended that paid-for advertising used to conduct scams or fraud should be included in the scope of the bill.<br><br>Other recommendations include Ofcom drawing up codes of practice on topics including child exploitation and [http://nude-milf.top/ http://nude-milf.top/] terrorism with which tech platforms must comply, as well as adding new codes when new problems arise so that the legislation remains relevant as tech changes.<br><br>"The era of self-regulation for big tech has come to an end," said Collins. "The companies are clearly responsible for services they have designed and profit from, and need to be held to account for the decisions they make."<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
id="article-body" class="row" section="article-body" data-component="trackCWV"><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>UK lawmakers want to further tighten new rules governing Big Tech ahead of a parliamentary vote. A joint committee of members of Parliament from the House of Commons and peers from the House of Lords published recommendations on Tuesday to tighten the draft Online Safety Bill before Parliament votes on the legislation next year.<br>The , previou and to . At the conclusion of their investigation, they have published a report advising that the new law should apply more widely than currently stated in the draft bill.<br><br>"The Committee has set out recommendations to bring more offences clearly within the scope of the Online Safety Bill, give Ofcom the power in law to set minimum safety standards for the services they will regulate, and to take enforcement action against companies if they don't comply," said Committee Chair Damian Collins in a statement.<br><br>The recommendations suggest new criminal offenses be added to the bill, including "cyberflashing" (sending unwanted nude pictures) and content encouraging people to self-harm. They also suggest making it illegal to deliberately send flashing images to people with photosensitive epilepsy and giving porn sites a legal obligation to keep children off them. Additionally, the lawmakers recommended that paid-for advertising used to conduct scams or fraud should be included in the scope of the bill.<br><br>Other recommendations include Ofcom drawing up codes of practice on topics including child exploitation and [http://nude-milf.top/ http://nude-milf.top/] terrorism with which tech platforms must comply, as well as adding new codes when new problems arise so that the legislation remains relevant as tech changes.<br><br>"The era of self-regulation for big tech has come to an end," said Collins. "The companies are clearly responsible for services they have designed and profit from, and need to be held to account for the decisions they make."<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1656795873