Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | ReaganM09088 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 0 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Dutch Journalists Rights Group File Lawsuit Challenging EU Ban On... |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Dutch Journalists Rights Group File Lawsuit Challenging EU Ban On... |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>By Toby Sterling<br> <br>AMSTERDAM, May 25 (Reuters) - The [https://pixabay.com/images/search/main%20Dutch/ main Dutch] journalists' union on Wednesday filed a [https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=lawsuit%20challenging lawsuit challenging] the European Union's ban on Russian state-backed media outlets as a violation of European citizens' own rights to freedom of information.<br> <br>The EU issued sweeping restrictions on the [https://pixabay.com/images/search/distribution/ distribution] of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe on March 2 as part of sanctions against Moscow, arguing that they produced propaganda used to justify and [http://www.techandtrends.com/?s=support support] the invasion of Ukraine.<br> <br>The Dutch lawsuit, filed at the EU's Court of Justice, did not endorse the content produced by the Russian organizations or say that European broadcasters should carry them.<br> <br>Rather, it said the ban was overly broad and that allowing politicians to enact censorship policies overnight is wrong in principle.<br> <br>"If you're talking about sanctions, then the idea is to punish Russia," said Thomas Bruning of the Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten (NVJ).<br> <br>"But in fact you're punishing the European people, by not treating them like adults and not giving them the possibility to access information."<br> <br>He said that allowing the ban to go unchallenged could set a precedent for banning other politicized [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] outlets. |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-
+<br>By Toby Sterling<br> <br>AMSTERDAM, May 25 (Reuters) - The [https://pixabay.com/images/search/main%20Dutch/ main Dutch] journalists' union on Wednesday filed a [https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=lawsuit%20challenging lawsuit challenging] the European Union's ban on Russian state-backed media outlets as a violation of European citizens' own rights to freedom of information.<br> <br>The EU issued sweeping restrictions on the [https://pixabay.com/images/search/distribution/ distribution] of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe on March 2 as part of sanctions against Moscow, arguing that they produced propaganda used to justify and [http://www.techandtrends.com/?s=support support] the invasion of Ukraine.<br> <br>The Dutch lawsuit, filed at the EU's Court of Justice, did not endorse the content produced by the Russian organizations or say that European broadcasters should carry them.<br> <br>Rather, it said the ban was overly broad and that allowing politicians to enact censorship policies overnight is wrong in principle.<br> <br>"If you're talking about sanctions, then the idea is to punish Russia," said Thomas Bruning of the Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten (NVJ).<br> <br>"But in fact you're punishing the European people, by not treating them like adults and not giving them the possibility to access information."<br> <br>He said that allowing the ban to go unchallenged could set a precedent for banning other politicized [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] outlets.
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>By Toby Sterling<br> <br>AMSTERDAM, May 25 (Reuters) - The [https://pixabay.com/images/search/main%20Dutch/ main Dutch] journalists' union on Wednesday filed a [https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=lawsuit%20challenging lawsuit challenging] the European Union's ban on Russian state-backed media outlets as a violation of European citizens' own rights to freedom of information.<br> <br>The EU issued sweeping restrictions on the [https://pixabay.com/images/search/distribution/ distribution] of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe on March 2 as part of sanctions against Moscow, arguing that they produced propaganda used to justify and [http://www.techandtrends.com/?s=support support] the invasion of Ukraine.<br> <br>The Dutch lawsuit, filed at the EU's Court of Justice, did not endorse the content produced by the Russian organizations or say that European broadcasters should carry them.<br> <br>Rather, it said the ban was overly broad and that allowing politicians to enact censorship policies overnight is wrong in principle.<br> <br>"If you're talking about sanctions, then the idea is to punish Russia," said Thomas Bruning of the Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten (NVJ).<br> <br>"But in fact you're punishing the European people, by not treating them like adults and not giving them the possibility to access information."<br> <br>He said that allowing the ban to go unchallenged could set a precedent for banning other politicized [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] outlets.
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1667827858 |
