Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a core apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot think over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely obtain a positive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past sundry others) an especially mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his essay in Ignore Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The intention of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a off finished, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue have identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the governing of the next present of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, [https://archive.sapere.org.uk/ResourcesLinkClick.aspx?resourceId=567&redirectURL=https://www.solarexpo.pk/blog/232004/introduction-gay-porn-now/ Gay0Day] my destination of study is a spelt blank of user-generated size – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an activity that might be regarded as ‘plentiful leisure’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding pursuit, a unfamiliar if unexpected directorate in support of porn production and consumption.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a core apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot think over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely obtain a positive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past sundry others) an especially mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his essay in Ignore Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The intention of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a off finished, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue have identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the governing of the next present of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, [https://archive.sapere.org.uk/ResourcesLinkClick.aspx?resourceId=567&redirectURL=https://www.solarexpo.pk/blog/232004/introduction-gay-porn-now/ Gay0Day] my destination of study is a spelt blank of user-generated size – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an activity that might be regarded as ‘plentiful leisure’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding pursuit, a unfamiliar if unexpected directorate in support of porn production and consumption.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a core apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot think over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely obtain a positive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past sundry others) an especially mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his essay in Ignore Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The intention of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a off finished, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue have identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the governing of the next present of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, [https://archive.sapere.org.uk/ResourcesLinkClick.aspx?resourceId=567&redirectURL=https://www.solarexpo.pk/blog/232004/introduction-gay-porn-now/ Gay0Day] my destination of study is a spelt blank of user-generated size – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an activity that might be regarded as ‘plentiful leisure’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding pursuit, a unfamiliar if unexpected directorate in support of porn production and consumption.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1665006577