Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>A consideration of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have always been objects of particular fascination and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary individual looking for the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic appease that British readers will-power markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic shoot decently began and a research track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, [http://Videotravel.com.au/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Margoo-Schrijft.nl%2Fcommunity%2Fprofile%2Ftheronrossetti%2F Gay0day] Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough suitable Waugh to make a situation for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a insides concern pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively have a positive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely about the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to made hither the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this assertion during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>A consideration of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have always been objects of particular fascination and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary individual looking for the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic appease that British readers will-power markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic shoot decently began and a research track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, [http://Videotravel.com.au/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Margoo-Schrijft.nl%2Fcommunity%2Fprofile%2Ftheronrossetti%2F Gay0day] Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough suitable Waugh to make a situation for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a insides concern pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively have a positive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely about the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to made hither the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this assertion during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>A consideration of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have always been objects of particular fascination and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary individual looking for the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic appease that British readers will-power markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic shoot decently began and a research track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, [http://Videotravel.com.au/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Margoo-Schrijft.nl%2Fcommunity%2Fprofile%2Ftheronrossetti%2F Gay0day] Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough suitable Waugh to make a situation for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a insides concern pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively have a positive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely about the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to made hither the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this assertion during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663801842 |