Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>I be affiliated to a cultural and federal ambiance – the urban gay male community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a off done, so it is it is possible that more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared past numberless others) an especially substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his effort in Ignore Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric instead of division and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than referral to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to indicate the governing of the next present of my own unbroken research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my object of cramming is a specific form of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous operation, a new if unexpected administering for porn production and consumption.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers will markedly understand [http://Backendbattles.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=bidbarrel.com%2Fuser%2Fprofile%2F57811 Gay0Day] – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>I be affiliated to a cultural and federal ambiance – the urban gay male community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a off done, so it is it is possible that more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared past numberless others) an especially substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his effort in Ignore Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric instead of division and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than referral to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to indicate the governing of the next present of my own unbroken research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my object of cramming is a specific form of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous operation, a new if unexpected administering for porn production and consumption.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers will markedly understand [http://Backendbattles.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=bidbarrel.com%2Fuser%2Fprofile%2F57811 Gay0Day] – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>I be affiliated to a cultural and federal ambiance – the urban gay male community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a off done, so it is it is possible that more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared past numberless others) an especially substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his effort in Ignore Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric instead of division and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than referral to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to indicate the governing of the next present of my own unbroken research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my object of cramming is a specific form of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous operation, a new if unexpected administering for porn production and consumption.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers will markedly understand [http://Backendbattles.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=bidbarrel.com%2Fuser%2Fprofile%2F57811 Gay0Day] – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663349887 |