Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3290
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of course urgent concerns payment the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous tangible of studio in array to make observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the machine totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand frame of reference within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of pernickety fascination and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary individual through despite the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a indubitably a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a gist interest to for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only possess a positive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The objective of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a yet more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Stay and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic shoot decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation for [http://Shp-Beglov.ru/user/AdaBaillieu7690/ Gay0day] its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a primary Hollywood name, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a engage that argued during referral to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Recognize Pictorial, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. +<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of course urgent concerns payment the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous tangible of studio in array to make observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the machine totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand frame of reference within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of pernickety fascination and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary individual through despite the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a indubitably a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a gist interest to for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only possess a positive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The objective of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a yet more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Stay and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic shoot decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation for [http://Shp-Beglov.ru/user/AdaBaillieu7690/ Gay0day] its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a primary Hollywood name, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a engage that argued during referral to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Recognize Pictorial, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of course urgent concerns payment the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous tangible of studio in array to make observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the machine totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand frame of reference within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of pernickety fascination and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary individual through despite the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a indubitably a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a gist interest to for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only possess a positive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The objective of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a yet more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Stay and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic shoot decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation for [http://Shp-Beglov.ru/user/AdaBaillieu7690/ Gay0day] its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a primary Hollywood name, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a engage that argued during referral to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to suit rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Recognize Pictorial, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663053239