Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
CarinUqr224
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
0
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Dozens Of U.S. States Say Apple Stifles Competition Back...
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Dozens Of U.S. States Say Apple Stifles Competition Back...
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>By Paresh Dave<br> <br>OAKLAND, Calif., Jan 27 (Reuters) - Apple Inc is stifling competition through its mobile app store, attorneys general for 34 U.S.<br>states and the District of Columbia said on Thursday, as they appealed against a ruling that let the iPhone maker continue some restrictive practices.<br> <br>The remarks to an appeals court came in a lawsuit over app store fees and payment tools between "Fortnite" video game maker Epic Games and Apple.<br> <br>Last year, a U.S.<br><br>district judge in Oakland, [https://fortnite-sex.com/ https://fortnite-sex.com/] California mostly ruled against Epic, in a finding that commissions of 15% to 30% which Apple charges some app makers for use of an in-app payment system it forced on them did not violate antitrust law.<br> <br>Epic challenged the ruling in the 9th U.S.<br>Circuit Court of Appeals. On Thursday, professors, activist groups and the states weighed in through court filings that described legal arguments in support. Apple's reply is expected in March. (Reporting by Paresh Dave; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ - +<br>By Paresh Dave<br> <br>OAKLAND, Calif., Jan 27 (Reuters) - Apple Inc is stifling competition through its mobile app store, attorneys general for 34 U.S.<br>states and the District of Columbia said on Thursday, as they appealed against a ruling that let the iPhone maker continue some restrictive practices.<br> <br>The remarks to an appeals court came in a lawsuit over app store fees and payment tools between "Fortnite" video game maker Epic Games and Apple.<br> <br>Last year, a U.S.<br><br>district judge in Oakland, [https://fortnite-sex.com/ https://fortnite-sex.com/] California mostly ruled against Epic, in a finding that commissions of 15% to 30% which Apple charges some app makers for use of an in-app payment system it forced on them did not violate antitrust law.<br> <br>Epic challenged the ruling in the 9th U.S.<br>Circuit Court of Appeals. On Thursday, professors, activist groups and the states weighed in through court filings that described legal arguments in support. Apple's reply is expected in March. (Reporting by Paresh Dave; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>By Paresh Dave<br> <br>OAKLAND, Calif., Jan 27 (Reuters) - Apple Inc is stifling competition through its mobile app store, attorneys general for 34 U.S.<br>states and the District of Columbia said on Thursday, as they appealed against a ruling that let the iPhone maker continue some restrictive practices.<br> <br>The remarks to an appeals court came in a lawsuit over app store fees and payment tools between "Fortnite" video game maker Epic Games and Apple.<br> <br>Last year, a U.S.<br><br>district judge in Oakland, [https://fortnite-sex.com/ https://fortnite-sex.com/] California mostly ruled against Epic, in a finding that commissions of 15% to 30% which Apple charges some app makers for use of an in-app payment system it forced on them did not violate antitrust law.<br> <br>Epic challenged the ruling in the 9th U.S.<br>Circuit Court of Appeals. On Thursday, professors, activist groups and the states weighed in through court filings that described legal arguments in support. Apple's reply is expected in March. (Reporting by Paresh Dave; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1657117089